Disposed

M/s. Hetero Drugs Limited v. The State Government of A.P.

Telangana HC3 Mar 2016WP/15311/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition was disposed of as the presiding officer of the appellate authority became available. The Court directed the authority to decide the pending appeal within six months and directed the petitioner to place the order before the authority within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal within six months; petitioner to submit the order within two weeks.

M/s. Hetero Drugs Limited Vs The State Government of A.P. — Telangana HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND

¶2

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶3

WRIT PETITION No.15311 of 2013

¶4

Dt:03.03.2016

¶5

Between:

¶6

M/s. Hetero Drugs Limited Unit-4.

¶7

… Petitioner

¶8

And

¶9

The State Government of Andhra Pradesh and others.

¶10

… Respondents

¶11

HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶12

WRIT PETITION No. 15311 of 2013

¶13

PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)

¶14

Mr.V.B.Subrahmanyam, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the order impugned in the instant writ petition has also been challenged by the petitioner in appeal (Annexure P10) before the appellate authority under Section 31 of the Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and Section 28 of Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the petitioner would be satisfied if directions are issued to the appellate authority to decide the appeal within timeframe.

¶15

It appears that since the Presiding Officer of the appellate authority was not available, the petitioner had filed the instant writ petition and this Court vide order, dated 29.05.2013, granted interim order in favour of the petitioner.

¶16

It is not in dispute that the Presiding Officer of the appellate authority is now available and the appeal filed by the petitioner can be heard and decided on merits. In view thereof, learned counsel for the parties have agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following order:

¶17

“The appellate authority shall consider and decide the appeal, as aforementioned, filed by the petitioner against the order impugned

¶18

in the present writ petition, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today. The petitioner is directed to place this order before the appellate authority within a period of two weeks from today.

¶19

Interim order passed by this Court, dated 29.05.2013, shall remain operative pending the hearing and final disposal of the appeal. All contentions of the parties are kept open.”

¶20

With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶21

DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ

¶22

________________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J Dt:03.03.2016 kdl

M/s. Hetero Drugs Limited v. The State Government of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Hetero Drugs Limited v. The State Government of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankal Reddy Memorial Hall, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Sadhu Rama Rao, Vs The Government of A.P.

Shake Nazeer Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Hyderabad Race Club Vs The mandal Revenue Officer, Amberpet Mandal

Shanmugam, S/o. Rajappa, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its

M.Karunaraju, Vs State of Telangana