The court dismissed a Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. as withdrawn by the petitioner. The court directed the trial court to dispose of any pending Section 70(2) Cr.P.C. petition considering the petitioner's health.
Petition withdrawn; trial court directed to dispose of any Section 70(2) Cr.P.C. petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2572 of 2016
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. questioning the orders dated 26.09.2016 in Crl.M.P.No.647 of 2016 in C.C.No.5 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Palamaner & FAC/ Special Magistrate, Palamaner.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri V.Surendra Reddy, seeks permission of this court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case with a liberty to appear before the trial Court. He further submitted that the trial Court may be directed to dispose of the petition if any filed by the petitioner under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C. on the same day. Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. The trial Court is hereby directed to dispose of the petition, if any filed by the petitioner under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C. on the same day taking into consideration the health condition of the petitioner and other attending circumstances without being influenced with the orders passed in Crl.M.P.No.647 of 2016. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
October 18, 2016 Rns
2 provisions across 1 enactments
T.Sunil Chowdary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
