The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 7483 of 2006 allowing the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to make a representation to the concerned authorities, which shall be disposed of in accordance with law.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to make representation to authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 7483 of 2006
Dt:14.09.2015
Between:
S.Uma Maheswara.
… Petitioner
And
The District Collector and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 7483 of 2006
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice S.V.Bhatt)
Sri Mukund Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, requests the Court to permit him to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the authorities against the complaint in the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the authorities and we hope and trust that if representation is made, the representation is required to be considered and disposed of in accordance with law by the concerned authority.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________
Dt: 14.09.2015
kdl
S.Uma Maheswara.
The District Collector and others.
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
