Dismissing a writ petition for non-prosecution due to lack of response/instructions from the client despite pending status since 2005.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 26534 OF 2005
Date: 11.09.2015
Between:
Devarakonda Prasad
… Petitioner
And
The Principal Secretary to Government, General Administration (L&O-I) Department, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 26534 OF 2005
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
This writ petition is pending since 2005. Today, when it was called out, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not getting any response/instructions from his client.
It appears that vide order, dated 24.01.2006, interim stay was refused. In view thereof, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting this writ petition further and hence, he is not coming forward to give instructions to his counsel. We are therefore constrained to dismiss the writ petition for nonprosecution. Order accordingly.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Date: 11.09.2015
ES
Devarakonda Prasad
The Principal Secretary to Government, General Administration (L&O-I) Department, Hyderabad
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
