The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to provide representation or updated instructions on the date of hearing.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution. Miscellaneous petitions disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 5323 of 2006
Dt:14.09.2015
Between:
Raj Kumar Vigg and others.
… Petitioners
And
The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 5323 of 2006
PC: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice S.V.Bhatt)
Sri Thoom Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that he does not have latest ninformation/instructions from the petitioners.
The petitioners it appears did not make alternative arrangement for representation of the case.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
Dt: 14.09.2015 kdl
Raj Kumar Vigg and others
The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
