S. Shivarajamma, v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION…
SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION Nos.36300 and 39336 of 2012
COMMON ORDER:
When WP.No.36300 of 2012 was listed on 03.08.2015, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Hence the matter was directed to be posted on 10.08.2015, under the caption ‘for dismissal’, on which date none appeared nor was made any representation on behalf of the petitioner, as such, the matter was directed to be listed on 11.08.2015 along with connected WP.No.39336 of 2012.
Today, when these matters are taken up for hearing, it is represented that the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has given up ‘vakalat’.
As the petitioner in both the writ petitions is one and the same and is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the cases and she has not made any alternative arrangements for engaging other counsel, the writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the writ petitions, Interim Orders, if any passed, shall stand dissolved.
___________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
17.08. 2015 t k
Petitioner
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court