Disposed
K.V. Reddy, v. Mr. Q.v.Nageswara Rao
Telangana HCCC/810/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.810 OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.810 OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE No.810 OF 2015
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of the order dated 21.09.2013, passed by this Court in WP.No.4249 of 2004, which reads as follows;
“The Second respondent is directed to treat the reinstatement of the petitioner as with continuity of service and attendant benefits, but without back wages.”
Today, the learned standing counsel for the respondent produced proceedings No.P2/369(1)/2015-BKP, dated 10.08.2015, which shows that petitioner was already reinstated. As far as attendant benefits are concerned, learned counsel stated that the same were sanctioned and sent to accounts department and that the same will be paid within a period of four weeks.
In view of the above, I do not see any violation committed by the respondent. However, the respondent shall release the attendant benefits rising out of the order dated 21.09.2013, passed by this Court in WP.No.4249 of 2004, within a period of four weeks from today.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the contempt case, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
17.08.2015
tk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent violated the order dated 21.09.2013 regarding the petitioner's reinstatement and attendant benefits.
Petitioner
Respondent
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court