The writ petition alleging demolition of property without notice was dismissed by this Court as the petitioner had died during the pendency of the writ, causing the cause of action to cease to exist.
The writ petition is dismissed as the cause does not survive due to the petitioner's death during pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
W.P.No.14197 OF 2011
O R D E R
The case of the petitioner is that the respondents without issuing any notice are trying to demolish the property of the petitioner.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of this writ petition, the petitioner was issued show cause notice and he filed W.P.No.16800 of 2011 and this Court passed interim orders. Further, it is stated, during the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner passed away.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the cause in the writ petitioner does not survive for further adjudication. As such, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J Date: 17.08.2015 dv
PETITIONER
RESPONDENTS
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
