The appeal suit was dismissed due to non-appearance by the appellants despite repeated listings under the caption for dismissal, resulting in a default dismissal of the appeal and pending miscellaneous petitions.
Dismissal of the appeal suit and pending miscellaneous petitions for default of appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
APPEAL SUIT No. 954 OF 1997
JUDGMENT:
When the matter was listed on 26.08.2015, it is brought to the notice of this Court that, Sri T. Jagdish, learned counsel for the appellants is no more and, hence, the Registry was directed to print the names of appellants in the cause list. When the matter appeared in the cause list on 10.09.2015, by printing the names of appellants, there was no representation and, hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 18.09.2015. Even today, despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
Hence, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default.
In consequence, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Appeal, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
_____________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J Date: 18.09.2015. Dsh
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
72
18092015
APPEAL SUIT No. 954 OF 1997
Date.18.09.2015
DSH
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
