Appeal Suit dismissed for default due to non-appearance and lack of prosecuting interest by appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
APPEAL SUIT No. 901 OF 1997
JUDGMENT:
When the matter was called on 27.08.2015, there was no representation for the appellants and, hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ to this date. Even today, when the matter appeared in the cause list, there is no representation for the appellants. As I find that the appellants are not evincing any interest to prosecute the Appeal, the Appeal Suit is liable to be dismissed.
Hence, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default.
In consequence, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Appeal, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
_____________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J Date: 18.09.2015. Dsh
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
64
18092015
APPEAL SUIT No. 901 OF 1997
Date.18.09.2015
DSH
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
