The court dismissed the Appeal Suit No. 952 of 1997 for default, noting the appellant's continued absence and failure to appear, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, were similarly dismissed.
The Appeal Suit is dismissed for default; pending miscellaneous petitions are dismissed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
APPEAL SUIT No. 952 OF 1997
JUDGMENT:
When the matter was called on 27.08.2015, there was no representation on either side and, hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ to this date. Even today, when the matter appeared in the cause list, there is no representation for the appellant. As I find that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute the Appeal, the Appeal Suit is liable to be dismissed.
Hence, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default.
In consequence, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this
Appeal, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
_____________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J Date: 18.09.2015. Dsh
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
68
18092015
APPEAL SUIT No. 952 OF 1997
Date.18.09.2015
DSH
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Appeal Suit can be dismissed for default due to the appellant's lack of representation.
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
