The single judge dismissed the appeal as it was withdrawn by the appellants, who were granted liberty to pursue remedies in other pending suit or proceedings.
Permission granted to appellants to workout remedies in other pending sued or separate comprehensive legal proceedings; appeal dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY APPEAL SUIT No.558 of 1997
JUDGMENT:
Sri Kuncheam Maheswara Rao, the learned counsel for the appellants, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to the appellants to workout their remedies in other suit pending before the Court at Anantapur or in a separate comprehensive legal proceedings and the same is endorsed on the bundle.
In view of the endorsement, permission is granted to the appellants to workout their legal remedies in the pending suit in Anantapur Court or in a separate comprehensive legal proceedings.
Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, but without costs, in the circumstances.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Appeal shall stand closed.
__________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Date: 23.06.2015 Ivd
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
