The Supreme Court permitted withdrawal of an appeal settled out of court. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and pending miscellaneous petitions were dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
A.S.No.445 OF 2010
JUDGMENT :
Sri P.V.Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the appellants filed a letter, dated 22.06.2015 before the Registry seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the appeal as it was settled out of Court.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions in this appeal, if any, shall stand dismissed.
__________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J 23.06.2015 kvrm
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
A.S.No.445 OF 2010
DATE: 23.06.2015
kvrm
2 issues framed by the court
Whether permission to withdraw the appeal after out-of-court settlement should be accorded?
Whether pending miscellaneous petitions in the withdrawn appeal should be dismissed?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
nullReferred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri P.V.Vidyasagar
unnamed respondent
M.Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
