The appellant failed to appear despite notices and the court passing it for dismissal was called twice at later hours without representation. The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution without costs.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY APPEAL SUIT No.669 of 1997
JUDGMENT:
Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, the colleague of Sri M.Sivananda Kumar, the learned counsel for the appellant, sought time and requested this Court to pass over for few minutes. Again called at 2:15 PM, but none represented on behalf of the appellant and again called at 3:20 PM even then, nobody represented on behalf of the appellant despite reporting readiness by the learned counsel for the respondents.
Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution but without costs in the circumstances.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Appeal shall stand closed.
__________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Date: 22.06.2015 Ivd
appellant
respondents
M.Satyayanarayana Murthy J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
