A writ petition filed by N. Sreenivasulu against the District Collector was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on three previous hearing dates and did not appear on this occasion, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THUIRSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.6004 of 2011
BETWEEN
N. Sreenivasulu.
... PETITIONER
AND
The District Collector, Kurnool and others.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. R. RAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Nobody appeared for the petitioner on the last three dates of hearing and even today, nobody appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
April 10, 2014 DSK
N. Sreenivasulu
The District Collector, Kurnool
Vilas V. Afzulkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
