S.Narendra, v. Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismissed a writ petition filed for appointment on compassionate grounds, declaring the CNWLIT-IA award's infructuous declaratory nature.
This order dismissed a writ petition filed for appointment on compassionate grounds, declaring the CNWLIT-IA award's infructuous declaratory nature.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
WRIT PETITION No.490 OF 2003
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking Writ of Mandamus to declare Memo No.3584/Ser.III(A2)/2002, dated 05.09.2002 issued by the first respondent as arbitrary and contrary to law and set aside the same and consequently to direct the first respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds.
Smt. Shobha, the learned counsel, representing
Sri V.Jagapathi, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the purpose of filing the present writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 13.11.2014 Ivd
Sri V.Jagapathi
First Respondent
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court