A single-paragraph order dismissing a writ appeal filed by the appellant against an earlier batch of writ petitions, noting that the matter follows the dismissed appeal in a related writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT APPEAL No. 1588 OF 2014
06-12-2014
BETWEEN
Food Corporation of India, Head Quarters, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, rep., by its Chairman and three others
…Appellants
And
Presiding Officer, The Central Government Industrial Tribunalcum-Labour Court, Hyderabad and another
…..Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT APPEAL No. 1588 OF 2014
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy)
This writ appeal is filed against the order dated
04-04-2014 passed in Writ Petition No. 539 of 2006 and batch, of which Writ Petition No.541 of 2006 is part.
Learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the respondents submit that the said batch of writ petitions were disposed of following the order passed in Writ Petition No.538 of 2006 and that Writ Appeal No. 1311 of 2014 filed against the order in Writ Petition No.538 of 2006 was dismissed by this
Court after hearing both the parties at length
In that view of the matter, this writ appeal is also dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions pending in this appeal shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
___________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J
____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J 06-12-2014 ks
Food Corporation of India
Presiding Officer, The Central Government Industrial Tribunalcum-Labour Court, Hyderabad
L. Narasimha Reddy
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
