Dismissed
Shaik Ghousia Begum, v. Bank of Baroda
Telangana HCCMA/299/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
No. A dismissed for non-prosecution by Bencher's Court for lack of party representation at hearing.
What the court decided
AI extract
No. A dismissed for non-prosecution by Bencher's Court for lack of party representation at hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
C.M.A.No.299 of 2005
Date : 13-8-2014
Between : Shaik Ghousia Begum and another .. Appellants And Bank of Baroda and another .. Respondents
Counsel for appellants : None appeared Counsel for respondents : None appeared
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arises out of order dated 24-1-2005 in I.A.No.1130 of 2004 in O.S.No.52 of 1998 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa.
At the hearing, there is no representation for the parties.
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, CMAMP No.691 of 2005 filed for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous.
Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
Date : 13-8-2014 AM
Shaik Ghousia Begum
Bank of Baroda
C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court