Kothava Ramana , Ramaiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
What did the court decide?
Bail granted to the petitioner.
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
Bail granted to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY , THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRLP .No.10457 of 2013
Between:Kothava Ramana @ Ramaiah S/o. Kovvadayya
..... Petitioner/Accused No.4 in Cr.No. 111 of 2013 On the file of Polavaram Police Station, West Godavari District.
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
.....Respondent/ Complainant.
Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the
circumstances stated in the memo of grounds filed herein, the High Court
may be pleased to grant Anticipatory Bail to petitioner in connection with Crime No. 111 of 2012 on the file of Polavaram Police Station, Polavaram,
West Godavari District.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the
Petition and the Memo of Grounds filed herein, and upon hearing the arguments of SRI MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of respondentState, the Court made the following
ORDER :-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
TKK
HIGH COURT
RKR.J
DATE: 26-09-2013
ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER
CRL.P. No. 10457 of 2013
BAIL GRANTED
DRAFTED BY TKK DT.26-09-2013.
HIGH COURT
RKR.J
DATE: 26-09-2013
ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER
CRL.P. No. 10457 of 2013
BAIL GRANTED
Kothava Ramana @ Ramaiah
The State of Andhra Pradesh
R. KANTHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court