The court dismissed the contempt case as infructuous based on the representation by the petitioner's counsel that the subject matter had become infructuous. No order as to costs was passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.581 of 2012
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner represents that the subject matter of the contempt case has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous petition filed in this contempt case shall also stand disposed of.
__________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J
March 04, 2013. KTL
Petitioner
B. CHANDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
