Learned Counsel for the petitioners has referred to Form-8 in Award No.19/98-99 dated 20.11.1998 in L.A.O.P.No.981 of 2000, wherein in Serial Number 7 at column No.4 the extent against Sy.No.529/2 is shown as Ac.0.23 ½ guntas and in respect of Sy.No.530/2 the extent is shown as Ac.0.15 guntas against the name of Sama Narasimha Reddy (1st petitioner). Similarly, in Serial Number 8 the same extents have been shown in the same survey numbers against the name of Sama Sathi Reddy (2nd petitioner). Learned Counsel has also referred to the proceedings of the respondentSpecial Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) in Award No.19/98-99, wherein in Serial Number 5, the extent against Sy.No.530/2 is shown as Ac.0.30 guntas of land. Thus, it is clear that when the Award was passed the extents against Sy.No.530/2 is shown as Ac.015 guntas against the name of Sama Narasimha Reddy (1st petitioner) and Ac.0.15 guntas against the name of Sama Sathi Reddy (2nd petitioner). Therefore, the petitioners filed a petition under Section 152 C.P.C. praying the Court to amend the decree by adding the land admeasuring Ac.015 guntas each in Sy.No.530 i.e., Sy.No.530/2. However, the said petition has been returned observing that the property mentioned in the petition cannot be added at this stage and it should come through reference only.
