M.T. Jaya Lakshmi v. J.S.V. Prasad, I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
Closed a contempt case due to respondent court passing consequential orders requiring a fresh writ petition to interpret a government order.
What did the court decide?
Closed contempt case; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petition disposed of.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.558 of 2012
ORDER:
Learned Government Pleader for Higher Education submits that the respondents have passed consequential orders on 30-04-2012, after passing the impugned order by this Court.
2. Since the consequential orders have been passed, and it requires interpretation of G.O.Ms.No.203, Education Department, dated 18-06-1999, probably, the petitioner has to file a fresh writ petition.
3. In view of the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous petition filed in this contempt case shall also stand disposed of.
__________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J
March 04, 2013. KTL
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Petitioner
- respondent
The Respondents
Coram
B. CHANDRA KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/558/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court