The writ appeal, challenging the municipality's regulatory stance, was disposed of. The court relied on the appellant's affidavit committing to discontinue poultry operations by 1.4.2012 and found nothing further survived in the appeal.
Writ appeal and miscellaneous application were disposed of without further questions surviving.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.224 OF 2012
DATED:14.3.2012
Between: Kandula Ramachandra Rao … Appellant And Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Rep. by its Commissioner Vijayawada and others … Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.224 OF 2012
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur)
The appellant has filed an affidavit dt.6.3.2012 stating that the poultry business will be carried on till 1.4.2012 only.
2. In view of the affidavit filed by the appellant, we expect him to discontinue the poultry business with effect from 1.4.2012. Nothing further survives in this appeal.
3. The writ appeal is accordingly disposed of.
4. Miscellaneous application is also disposed of.
__________________ MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ
__________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 14-3-2012 bnr
Kandula Ramachandra Rao
Vijayawada Municipal Corporation
Madan B. Lokur
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
