Writ appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear or provide representation on the date of hearing.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.314 OF 2012
DATED:5.10.2012
Between: Saleem Bin Obaid Karban … Appellant And The Regional Passport Officer Regional Passport Office Hyderabad/Secunderabad … Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.314 OF 2012
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
When the case was called on 28.9.2012 none appeared for the appellant and hence the matter was directed to be listed next week for dismissal. Today also, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ none appears for the appellant nor there is any representation on his behalf.
The writ appeal is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J 5.10.2012
bnr
Saleem Bin Obaid Karban
The Regional Passport Officer
PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
