Petitioners sought permission to withdraw Public Interest Litigation No. 378 of 2012. The court granted liberty to apply afresh and dismissed the PIL as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw PIL with liberty to apply afresh with appropriate documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Public Interest Litigation No. 378 of 2012
DATED:19.11.2012
Between: Rama Melkote, Secunderabad and others. … Petitioners And The State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Chief Secretary, Hyderabad and others.
…. Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Public Interest Litigation No.378 of 2012
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation with liberty to apply afresh with appropriate documents.
While granting such liberty, the Public Interest Litigation is dismissed as withdrawn.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J 19-11-2012
pnb
Rama Melkote and others
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V Afzulkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
