Bharata Dharma Devatha Brahmachari Sri Sri Sri v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA…
THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.354 of 2012
DATED:5.11.2012
Between: Bharata Dharma Devatha Brahmachari Sri Sri Sri Siva Sawamy Mahasamsthanam Trust, Guntur District.
… Petitioner
And The Government of A.P., Home (PSC) Department, Hyderabad and others.
…. Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.354 of 2012
Order: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
Assailing the inaction of the respondent-authorities in implementing the provisions of the A.P. Prohibition of Cow Slaughter and Animal Preservation Act, 1977 (for short ‘the Act’) and in not formulating the Rules under the Act, the petitioner filed this Public Interest Litigation.
The issue raised in this Public Interest Litigation is squarely covered by the decision rendered by us in P.I.L. No. 266 of 2012, dated 3.9.2012.
Following the said decision and for the reasons stated therein, the Public Interest Litigation is disposed of.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J
5-11-2012
pnb
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bharata Dharma Devatha Brahmachari Sri Sri Sri Siva Sawamy Mahasamsthanam Trust
Government of A.P.
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court