The Acting Chief Justice dismissed a public interest litigation filed by M. Ramesh Reddy against the Government of Andhra Pradesh on the ground that the petition was infructuous.
The Public Interest Litigation was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Public Interest Litigation No.123 OF 2012
DATED:8.10.2012
Between:
M. Ramesh Reddy
… Petitioner
And The Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Hyderabad and others.
…. Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Public Interest Litigation No. 123 of 2012
Order: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Public Interest Litigation has become infructuous.
The Public Interest Litigation is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
_________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J Date: 8.10.2012
pnb
M. Ramesh Reddy
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
