The High Court dismissed the public interest litigation as withdrawn by the petitioners, with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Permission granted to withdraw the PIL with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.328 OF 2012
DATED:1.10.2012
Between: Pattana Pedala Sankshema Sangam and another. … Petitioners And
The District Collector, Hyderabad and others.
…. Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.328 of 2012
Order: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition.
While granting such liberty, the public interest litigation is dismissed as withdrawn.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J 1.10.2012 pnb
Pattana Pedala Sankshema Sangam
District Collector, Hyderabad
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
