The Hon'ble Supreme Court, while hearing a PIL, permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn without any costs awarded.
Permission to withdraw the public interest litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.165 OF 2012
DATED:24.9.2012
Between: B. Ram Mohan Reddy … Petitioner (party-in-person) And The Principal Secretary General Administration Department (Human Rights) Government of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Hyderabad and others … Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.165 OF 2012
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this public interest litigation.
Permission is granted.
The public interest litigation is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J 24.9.2012
bnr
B. Ram Mohan Reddy
Principal Secretary General Administration Department (Human Rights) Government of Andhra Pradesh
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
