The single-judge bench dismissed the C.M.A. for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear on multiple hearing dates with no representation.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
C.M.A.No.1054 of 2012
Dated 20-12-2012
Between:
Irafan Ahmed Mallik and another.
..Appellants.
And:
Devendra S.Kimtee.
…Respondent.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
C.M.A.No.1054 of 2012
JUDGMENT:
None appears for the appellants. No representation on their behalf.
A perusal of the Proceeding Sheet reveals that none appeared for appellants on three occasions i.e., on 6-11-2012, 22-11-2012 and 6-12-2012.
It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal any further and as such, the appeal is liable to be dismissed.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
___________________ Justice B.N.RAO NALLA Dated 20-12-2012. Dvs
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
C.M.A.No.1054 of 2012 Dated 20-12-2012
Irafan Ahmed Mallik and another
Devendra S. Kimtee
B.N.Rao Nalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
