The writ petition was dismissed by a single judge on the submission that the petition had become infructuous. No costs were awarded.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.18317 of 2009
Date: November 04, 2011
Between:
Cheepurupalli Shirish … Petitioner
And
1. Central Counselling Board (AIEEE-2009), rep. by its Secretary, MHRD, Govt. of India, National Institute of Technology, Warangal & another. … Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.18317 of 2009
O R D E R:
Sri G. Gopalakrishna, learned counsel representing Dr. P.B. Vijayakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is
dismissed. No order as to costs.
____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
Date: November 04, 2011. BSB
Cheepurupalli Shirish
Central Counselling Board (AIEEE-2009), rep. by its Secretary, MHRD, Govt. of India, National Institute of Technology, Warangal & another.
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
