The High Court permitted the petitioner's counsel to withdraw the writ petition, consequently dismissing it as withdrawn without interim orders on costs.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.9355 of 2010
Date: November 03, 2011
Between: Master Mohammed Fayaque Ali … Petitioner
And 1. The Union of India, rep. by its Regional Passport Officer, Secunderabad & 2 others. … Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.9355 of 2010
O R D E R:
Sri Mohd. Shanoor, learned counsel representing Sri Nazir Ahmed Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission granted.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
___________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Date: November 03, 2011. BSB
Master Mohammed Fayaque Ali
The Union of India
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
