The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the subject matter had become infructuous and no cause for adjudication survived. No order as to costs was passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.14592 of 2010
BETWEEN
P.D.P.S.V. Abimanyu.
... PETITIONER
AND
Union of India, Ministry of Human Resources Department, New Delhi and two others.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. P.S.P. SURESH KUMR
Counsel for the Respondents: MR. PONNAM ASHOK GOUD MR. UNNAM MURLIDHAR RAO MR. M.S. SRINIVAS IYENGAR
The Court made the following order:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and there survives no cause for adjudication.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J November 3, 2011 DSK
P.D.P.S.V. Abimanyu
Union of India
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
