Pydi Krishna Prasad, v. Sri Visakha Grameena Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Petition was dismissed by a single judge as it became infructuous and no longer survived for further adjudication.
The Writ Petition was dismissed by a single judge as it became infructuous and no longer survived for further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 27191 of 1999
ORDER:
Sri N.Srihari, learned counsel representing Sri K.Bathi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO,J
Date 28.06.2010 usd
Sri K. Bathi Reddy
Respondent
Nooty Ramamohana Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court