Writ Petition No. 1129 of 2000 was dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that the cause does not survive for further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 1129 of 2000
O R D E R:
Sri T.L. Kantha Rao, learned counsel representing Sri C.M.R. Velu, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
---------------------------------(NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J)
25th June 2010
ksld
sri c.m.r. velu
nooty ramamohana rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
