E.O. T.T.Ds Tpt v. v. Udayasankar Gurukul
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ appeal challenging a single judge order quashing a show cause notice against an appellate clergy member, the court modified the lower order. It held the notice was insufficient for immediate quashing without أولاً allowing an explanation on eligibility. The respondent was ordered to remain in service pending final orders.
What did the court decide?
The impugned order allowing the writ petition was modified; the respondent is continued in service pending a proper show cause notice; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY
AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
WRIT APPEAL No.558 OF 2003
Between:
The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati.
… Appellant
And
V.Udayasankar Gurukul, Archaka(Gumasta), Sri Kapaleswara Swamy Temple, Tirupathi.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the show cause notice issued to the respondent was defective for preventing opportunity of hearing before its quashing.
Whether the respondent should be continued in service pending the hearing and final decision on the show cause notice.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati
- respondent
V.Udayasankar Gurukul
Coram
A. GOPAL REDDY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WA/558/2003
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court