Dismissed

Qamer Educational Society, Rep. by its President, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC4 Apr 2008WP/7345/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order passed under Section 10 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905, the High Court held that an alternative remedy exists via revision under Section 12-A. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition, granted four weeks to file the revision, and suspended the impugned order during that period.

What did the court decide?

Four weeks granted to file a revision under Section 12-A; impugned order suspended for said period; writ petition disposed of.

Qamer Educational Society, Rep. by its President, Vs The… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2008)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO : 7345 of 2008

¶6

Between:

¶7

Qamer Educational Society, Rep. by its President, Mohd. Muneeruddin S/o. Mahaboob Ali,

¶8

..... PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Secretary, Revenue Department, 2 The Special Grade Deputy Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chavella Division, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Tahsildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶11

.....RESPONDENT(S)

¶12

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Rule Nisi calling for the entire records leading upto and inclusive of the order passed by the 2nd respondent herein bearing Appeal Proceedings No. D/2748/2006 dated 17-8-2007, confirming the orders of the 3rd respondent herein in File No. B/1183/2005 dated 29-82006 and quash the same by issuing an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly in the nature of Certiorari, and pass other orders.

¶13

Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. SYED SHAREEF AHMED

¶14

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

¶15

The Court made the following :

¶16

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA

¶17

W.P.NO. 7345 OF 2008

¶18

ORDER:

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

¶20

Aggrieved by the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy district under Section 10 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for short “the Act”), the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶21

The learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that against the impugned order, there is an alternative, effective and efficacious remedy available to the petitioner by way of revision to Government under Section 12-A of the Act, to which the learned counsel for the petitioner also agreed and he sought four weeks’ time to file a revision. Four weeks’ time is granted to the petitioner to file a revision under Section 12-A of the Act. For a period of four weeks, the impugned order is suspended to enable the petitioner to approach the revisional authority.

¶22

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.

¶23

_______________ N.V. RAMANA, J

Dt. 4.4.2008 KR

..... REGISTRAR

/ TRUE COPY //

SECTION OFFICER

To 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Secretary, Revenue Department, 2 The Special Grade Deputy Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chavella Division, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Tahsildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4. 2 CCs to GP for Revenue, 5. 2 CD copies

¶29

Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}

Qamer Educational Society, Rep. by its President, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Qamer Educational Society, Rep. by its President, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.v.Shankar Reddy Vs The District Collector, District Ranga Reddy District

Mohd. Ahmed Ali Vs The District Collector

Smt. H. Sridevi, Vs Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board

M. Venkatesham Vs The Mandal Revenue Officer, Karimnagar.

Smt.a. Girija Reddy Vs The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

Polepalli Satyanarayana Vs The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole