Writ petition filed by proprietor of touring talkies against authorities threatening interference. Counsel argued the petition was infructuous. Court dismissed the writ without applying any substantive law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 12071 of 2001
Between:
Mogili Santhi, W/o. Manohar Reddy, Proprietrix of Sri Prabhakar Touring Talkies, R/o. 1-109, Thondavada Village and Post, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandmus declare the action of the respondents in threatening the petitioner in running the Sri Prabhakar Touring Talkies Chandragri Village, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District as illegal arbitrary violitive of Art.14, 19(1)(g) adn 21 of the Constitution of India besides being the provisions contemplated in A.P.Cinemas Act and Regulation Rules; and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere the petitioner in running the Sri Prabhakar Touring Talkies, Chandragiri Village, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.S.GOPALA KRISHNAN
Counsel for the Respondent : MR. FOR R GP FOR REVENUE FOR R
The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.12071 OF 2001
ORDER:
Sri K.S.Gopala Krishnan, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the writ petition has become
infructuous.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs.
____________ 14-11-2008
asp
Mogili Santhi
The Licensing Authority/District Collector
Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi
Mandal Revenue Officer, Chandragiri
M.Rama Narayana Reddy
M.Kamala
Ramesh Ranganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
