Writ petition filed challenging demand for lease amount and seeking agreement for quarrying sand was dismissed as infructuous by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 10573 of 2001
Between:
Siliveri Nagulu S/o Balaiah R/o Mandarana Village, Bodhan Mandal, Nizamabad District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Joint Collector Nizamabad District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Bodhan, Nizamabad District. 3 The M.R.O., Bodhan, Nizamabad District.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order, direction or Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in demanding payment of 2nd year lease amount of Rs.3, 03, 000/- to enter into an agreement for quarrying for send at Mandarna Village, Mandal, Bodhan, Nizamabad Dist., as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and violative of Rule 9 of the AP MMC Rules, 1996 and consquently direct the respondents to follow the rules enter into agreement with the petitioner for quarrying sand at Village Mandarna, Mandal, Bodhan, Nizamabad Dist., in the interest of justice and pass.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.BHOOMA GOUD
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION No.10573 OF 2001
ORDER:
Sri S.Bhooma Goud, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order
as to costs.
____________ 14-11-2008
asp
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Siliveri Nagulu
The Joint Collector Nizamabad District
The Revenue Divisional Officer Bodhan, Nizamabad District
The M.R.O., Bodhan, Nizamabad District
Ramesh Ranganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
