The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order proposing demolition of a compound wall. During hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that he was not pressing the petition, leading the Court to dismiss it as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELVETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION No. 9437 of 2001
Between:
B.Satyanarayana Murthy, S/o Rama Rao, R/o Kattamuru, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the notice issued by the 3rd Respondent vide R.K.Vo./2001, dt: 5-5-2001, in proposing to demolish the compound wall of the petitioner situated at Kattamuru Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, is arbitrary, illegal, and unconstitutional, and direct the respondent authorities not to demolish the petitioner compound wall of the petitioner, situated at Kattamuru Village, Peddapuram Mandal, E.G.District,
Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.G.KRISHNA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV.
The Court made the following :
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION No.9437 of 2001
ORAL ORDER :
Sri B.V.Rama Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri G.Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that they are not pressing the writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 12-11-2008. Msr
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION No.9437 of 2001
12-11-2008 Msr
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.Satyanarayana Murthy
The District Collector, East Godavari District
The District Panchayath Officer, Kakinada
The Executive Officer, Kattamuru Grampanchayath
The Person incharge-cum-Ex-Sarpanch, Kattamuru Grampanchyath
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
