A writ petition filed before the Hyderabad High Court was dismissed for lack of prosecution when the petitioner's counsel was absent on the date of hearing, with no representation on record. No substantive adjudication was made.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 31516 of 1998
DATED: 05.06.2007
Between:
Sri Y.Raja Sharma .. Petitioner. And
The Executive Engineer, Telecom Civil Division No.1 3-4-847, Barkatpura, Hyderabad-500027 .. Respondent.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.31516 of 1998
ORDER:
Today, when the matter was called, neither the counsel for the petitioner is present, nor there is any representation on his behalf. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
__________________ (R.SUBHASH REDDY,J)
Dt.05.06.2007 v v
Sri Y.Raja Sharma
The Executive Engineer, Telecom Civil Division No.1
R.Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
