This one-line order dismisses Writ Petition No. 17099 of 2007 for default due to the absence of the petitioners' counsel when the matter was listed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN
P R E S E N T
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.17099 of 2007
Between:
J.Satyavathi and Anr. … Petitioners
Versus
The Dy.Commissioner, Endowments Department Guntur & Anr. … Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI RAVIKUMAR (5397)
Counsel for the Respondents: GP for ENDOWMENTS SRI VTM PRASAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No. 17099 of 2007
O R D E R :
On 10-12-2007 no representation on behalf of the
petitioners. Sri VTM Prasad reports ready. The matter was adjourned to 11-12-2007 under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
When the matter is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the counsel for the writ petitioners. Sri VTM Prasad reports ready.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for default. No costs.
JUSTICE P S
NARAYANA.
11/12/2007.
ISL
J. Satyavathi and Anr.
The Dy. Commissioner, Endowments Department Guntur & Anr.
P.S. Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
