Five engineering firms filed a writ petition disputing the illegal disconnection of their electricity supply by the respondent utility at Fatehnagar, Hyderabad. The court held the case became infructuous and dismissed the petition without costs.
Petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26146 of 2001
Between:
1 Reliance Engineering Works, Prop. G. Narsimha, S/o. Sayanna, R/o. H. No. 11-186/1/D. Fatehnagar, Hyderabad. 2 Rama Engineering Company, Prop; M. Raghupathireddy, S/o. Agireddy, R/o. H. No. 11-186/1/S. Fatehnagar, Hyderabad. 3 M/s . Kiran Industries, Prop; K. Damodhar Reddy, S/o. Vittal Reddy, R/ o. H.No. 11-186/1/F, Fatehnagar, Hyderabad. 4 Jairaj S/o. Elisha, R/ o. H.No. 11-186/1, Fatehnagar, Hyderabad. 5 Krishna Roy., S/o. Ramdayal Roy, R/ o. H.No. 11-186/1, Fatehnagar, Hyderabad.
..... PETITIONERS
AND
The Divisional Engineer ( Electric ) A.P.C.P.D.C.L., OPP; I D P L Gate, Balanagar, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondent in disconnecting our electricity supply bearing Nos. ( 1 ) 61226 ( 2 ) 60991, ( 3 ) 65914 ( 4 ) 69231 and ( 5 ) 67636, in premises bearing Nos. (1) 11-186/1/A, (2) 11-186/1/S, (3) 11-186/1/F (4) 11-186/1 and (5) 11-186/1 situated at Fatehnagar, Hyderabad, respectively as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice, Consequently direct the respondent to restore the electricity connection to the said premises and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.ASHOK KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent : (SC FOR AP TRANSCO) V.AJAY KUMAR The Court made the following :
ORDER:
Sri N. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in this writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
7.7.2005
CVM
To,
1. The Divisional Engineer ( Electric ) A.P.C.P.D.C.L., OPP; I D P L Gate, Balanagar, Hyderabad.
2. 2 CD copies
Reliance Engineering Works, Prop. G. Narsimha
Rama Engineering Company, Prop. M. Raghupathireddy
M/s. Kiran Industries, Prop. K. Damodhar Reddy
Jairaj, S/o. Elisha
Krishna Roy., S/o. Ramdayal Roy
The Divisional Engineer (Electric), A.P.C.P.D.C.L.
R.Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
