Dismissed¶21

Satveer Singh S/O Shri Bijendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Apr 2026CRLMB/474/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan HC Jaipur [2026:RJ-JP:14777]; CRLMB-474/2026; Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur; bail rejected under S.483 BNSS; FIR 231/2025 PS Balghat Karauli; S.103(1) BNS 2023 (murder) read with S.3(5) BNS (common intention); last-seen evidence; delayed FIR ~13 days; recovery of deceased's shirt from conscious possession; call detail records linking petitioner, co-accused Rajvir and deceased; custody since 26.11.2025; charge-sheet filed; trial pending.

What did the court decide?

On consideration of rival submissions, the nature of the allegation, the recovery of the shirt and the call detail of the petitioner, and without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, the Court was not inclined to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner. ¶21

Satveer Singh S/O Shri Bijendra Singh Vs… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:14777]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 474/2026

¶4

Satveer Singh S/o Shri Bijendra Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gujar Patti Arej Police Station Balghat, District Karauli, Raj. (At Present Petitioner Confined At District Jail Karauli).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Manish Gupta
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP
For Complainant	: Mr.	Deshraj Sain
	Mr.	Lokesh Kumar Sharma

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶11

Order

¶12

09/04/2026

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.231/2025 registered at Police Station Balghat, District Karauli for offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the police has concluded the investigation with theory of last-seen evidence but no ocular evidence is available on record indicating the involvement of petitioner in this matter. He also submits that the FIR was lodged after a delay of approximately 13 days, which

[2026:RJ-JP:14777]

[CRLMB-474/2026]

(2 of 2)

casts serious doubts on the veracity of the prosecution’s story. Petitioner is behind the bars since 26.11.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and submit that a shirt belonging to the deceased was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that there is call detail record showing that the petitioner, the coaccused-Rajvir, and the deceased were present together at the relevant time on the date of the incident, which reflects the involvement of the petitioner in the matter. It is also submitted that the statements of the material witnesses support the case of the prosecution. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid factual matrix, the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of bail.

¶21

On consideration of the rival submissions and the material available on record, especially the nature of the allegation, recovery of the shirt as well as the call detail of the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, I am not inclined to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is dismissed.

¶22

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶23

Arun/12

Satveer Singh S/O Shri Bijendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satveer Singh S/O Shri Bijendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Leeladhar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju S/O Shivji Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Lokesh Urf Kalli S/O Prakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Ali Akbar Urf Anna S/O Shri Haidar Ali @ Pappu Vs State of Rajasthan

Indra Kumar Tank @ Jeet Tank Son of Late Shankar Lal Tank Vs State of Rajasthan

Satish Chand Ojha S/O Ramdeen Ojha, Vs State of Rajasthan