Raju S/O Shivji Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:14499]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3093/2026

Raju S/o Shivji Lal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Natbada, P.s. Baroni, District Tonk (Raj.) (Presently Residing At District Jail, Tonk).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3606/2026 Rajesh S/o Ambalal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Jhilay, Police Station Niwai City, District Tonk. (At Present Confined In District Jail Tonk).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s)	: Ms. Iti Shree Sharma with
	Mr. Aditya Sharma
	Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal with
	Mr. Hitesh Haritwal and
	Mr. Ankit Choudhary
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari,PP

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶17

Order

¶18

08/04/2026

¶19

The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.152/2025 registered at Police Station Purani Tonk, District-Tonk for offences under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023.

[2026:RJ-JP:14499]

[CRLMB-3093/2026]

(2 of 3)

Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order.

¶24

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that the allegations against the present petitioners pertain to the alleged theft of a motorcycle. Petitioners are behind the bars since 09.12.2025. Though 13 criminal antecedents have been registered against petitioner Rajesh and 12 against petitioner Raju but they have been granted bail in all such cases. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, these bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed.

¶25

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.

¶26

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.

¶27

Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners- Raju S/o Shivji Lal and Rajesh S/o Ambalal be released on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:14499]

[CRLMB-3093/2026]

shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:-

¶32

(i) that the petitioners shall mark their presence before the SHO, Police Station Purani Tonk, District Tonk in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.

¶33

(ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioners fails to mark their presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard.

¶34

(iii) that the petitioners shall not repeat any such offence in future.

¶35

(iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail.

¶36

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶37

Arun/10-11

Raju S/O Shivji Lal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju S/O Shivji Lal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sannu Khan S/O Hussain Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Yogesh Kumar Bairwa S/O Prabhulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramotar @ Rinku S/O Shri Dharm Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Leeladhar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Lokesh Urf Kalli S/O Prakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh S/O Ambalal Vs State of Rajasthan