Allowed¶20

Sannu Khan S/O Hussain Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Bail – Section 483 BNSS

Rajasthan HC7 Apr 2026CRLMB/4434/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4434/2026, Rajasthan HC Jaipur Bench, decided 07/04/2026 by Pramil Kumar Mathur, J.: fresh bail under S.483 BNSS granted after arrest pursuant to warrant following forfeiture of bail bonds in FIR No.263/2014 (PS Udhyog Nagar, Bharatpur) under Ss.279 & 304-A IPC; bail allowed on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, petitioner to appear on all trial dates.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner Sannu Khan S/o Hussain Khan on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, with the stipulation that he appear before the trial Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. ¶20

Sannu Khan S/O Hussain Khan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:14300]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4434/2026

¶4

Sannu Khan S/o Hussain Khan, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Jamalpur, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Bharatpur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

	----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Girish Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vivek Sharma,PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶10

Order

¶11

07/04/2026

¶12

The petitioner has filed this application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.263/2014 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Bharatpur for offence under Sections 279 and 304A of IPC, 1864 praying for grant of bail in a case wherein earlier the petitioner was released on bail, however, he failed to appear before the trial Court on the scheduled dates and his bail bonds were forfeited on 22.01.2015 and consequently arrest warrant was issued against him on 12.10.2021.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the absence of the accused was neither intentional nor deliberate. He again submits that petitioner is a daily wager and completely dependent on the day to day earning. Therefore, due to earning

[2026:RJ-JP:14300]

[CRLMB-4434/2026]

(2 of 2)

his livelihood he could not attend the Court on stipulated dates. The accused has now been taken in the custody in pursuance of the arrest warrant on 26.02.2026. Though the absence from the Court is considerable but the charges against the petitioner pertains only under Section 279 and 304-A IPC. Now petitioner undertakes to appear on each and every date of hearing in future. Therefore, in the interest of justice the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶19

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and the explanation furnished by learned counsel for the petitioner and nature of case but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the view that one more opportunity may be granted to petitioner to face trial.

¶20

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sannu Khan S/o Hussain Khan , be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶22

Chandan/48

Sannu Khan S/O Hussain Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sannu Khan S/O Hussain Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gajendra S/O Hargyan Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramkesh S/O Naresh Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharmendra S/O Shri Kishan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Yogesh Kumar Bairwa S/O Prabhulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramotar @ Rinku S/O Shri Dharm Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ram Kunwar Gurjar S/O Late Ram Karan Vs State of Rajasthan