Chandan S/O Motiram Vs the State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:10397]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2821/2026

Chandan S/o Motiram, R/o Deh, Police Station Surpaliya, District Nagaur, At Present Resident Of Chand Baasni Deedwana, Police Station Deedwana, District Deedwana-Kuchaman (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ravindra Singh Shekhawat
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
For Complainant	: Mr. Narsi Prasad Sharma

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶11

12/03/2026

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.218/2025 registered at Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner submits that the primary issue in this case revolves around the agreement executed between the co-accused, Arjun, and the complainantShahid Mohammed. The role of the present petitioner was solely as an attesting witness to the agreement. There are no cogent

[2026:RJ-JP:10397]

[CRLMB-2821/2026]

(2 of 2)

circumstances which shows the active contribution of the petitioner in the case. The petitioner is behind the bars since 29.01.2026 and has one previous criminal antecedent of a different nature. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, accordingly, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶20

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Chandan S/o Motiram , be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

¶22

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶23

Arun/18

Chandan S/O Motiram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan S/O Motiram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Somendra Kumar Saini @ Ashish S/O Shri Jagmohan Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajeev Dutta Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Bhagwat Prasad Saini S/O Chajaram Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Bantu @ Balram S/O Shri Jaishiv Vs State of Rajasthan

Makhan S/O Mahendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Narshi S/O Late Shri Nirpat Vs State of Rajasthan