Bantu @ Balram S/O Shri Jaishiv Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:10514]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16626/2025

Sachin Kumar @ Rawan S/o Jaswant Singh @ Chandrabose, R/o Lakhan Pengor, Police Station Kumher, District Deeg, Raj. ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1222/2026 Bantu @ Balram S/o Shri Jaishiv, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bansikhurd, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur (Raj.). (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub Jail Nadbai, District Bharatpur).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sogarwal with Mr. Hitesh Haritwal Mr. Rahul Sharma for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶17

Order

¶18

12/03/2026

¶19

The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.354/2025 registered at Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 333 and 109(1) of BNS, 2023.

[2026:RJ-JP:10514]

[CRLMB-16626/2025]

(2 of 3)

Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order.

¶24

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that although there is an allegation that a firearm was used causing injuries to the injured Sarman and Pista but none of the injuries have been opined as dangerous to life. He further submits that Sarman and Pista sustained injuries on the left leg, which is not a vital part of the body. He further submits that the other co-accused Abhishek Kumar and Satveer were released on bail by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2026 and the co-accused Harveer, Nishul, and Bharatlal were enlarged on bail by this Court on 10.12.2025. Therefore, on the ground of parity with other coaccused, the bail application of the petitioners may be granted. The petitioners Sachin and Bantu are in custody since 03.09.2025 and 05.12.2025, respectively and have fifteen and nine previous cases as antecedents. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶26

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶27

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any

[2026:RJ-JP:10514]

[CRLMB-16626/2025]

(3 of 3)

opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.

¶32

Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Sachin Kumar @ Rawan S/o Jaswant Singh @ Chandrabose and Bantu @ Balram S/o Shri Jaishiv, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:-

¶33

(i) that the petitioners shall mark their presence before the SHO, Police Station Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.

¶34

(ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard.

¶35

(iii) The petitioners shall not repeat any offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶36

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶37

Chandan/62-63

Bantu @ Balram S/O Shri Jaishiv v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bantu @ Balram S/O Shri Jaishiv v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Somendra Kumar Saini @ Ashish S/O Shri Jagmohan Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajeev Dutta Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Bhagwat Prasad Saini S/O Chajaram Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Makhan S/O Mahendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandan S/O Motiram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Narshi S/O Late Shri Nirpat Vs State of Rajasthan