Sanjay S/O Sunil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:10733]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Third Bail Application No. 2334/2026

Sanjay S/o Sunil Kumar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Kalwa, Police Station Nangal Chaudhary, District Mahendragarh (Hariyana) (At Present Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody At District Jail Kotputali).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through	Versus Pp
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ms. Mr.	Manish Gupta with Sweta Soni and Vishvendra Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr.	Devi Singh,PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶9

Order

¶10

13/03/2026

¶11

The petitioner has preferred this third bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.303/2025 registered at Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror for offences under Sections 3, 7 and 25 of Arms Act.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the present matter, petitioner is behind the bars since 19.10.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. Though nine cases have been reported against the present petitioner but in all cases he has been bailed out. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the

[2026:RJ-JP:10733]

[CRLMB-2334/2026]

(2 of 3)

petitioner in further custody, accordingly, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶19

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Consequently, the third bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner- Sanjay S/o Sunil Kumar be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:-

¶21

(i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Paniyala District KotputliBehror in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.

¶22

(ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard.

[2026:RJ-JP:10733]

[CRLMB-2334/2026]

(3 of 3)

(iii) that the petitioner shall not repeat any such offence in future.

¶27

(iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail.

¶28

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶29

Arun/33

Sanjay S/O Sunil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay S/O Sunil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bantu @ Balram S/O Shri Jaishiv Vs State of Rajasthan

Makhan S/O Mahendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandan S/O Motiram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Pushpendra @ Pussu S/O Late Sh. Ghanshaym Vs the State of Rajasthan

Asfak @ Aspak S/O Aabid Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh Kumar S/O Bhimsingh Vs State of Rajasthan