Allowed

Kanaram S/O Late Shri Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Feb 2026CRLMB/1391/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS by an accused charged under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 307 and 140(3) BNS for allegedly blackmailing a woman by threatening to circulate a video and demanding three lakh rupees. Custody since October 2025, charge-sheet filed, no injury report on record; bail granted on furnishing bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two reliable sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, subject to appearing before the trial court on all dates.

Kanaram S/O Late Shri Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:5321]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 1391/2026

¶4

Kanaram S/o Late Shri Mangilal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Raiwasa, Police Station Jeenmata, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Padeep Bochaliya, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

05/02/2026

¶13

dk;kZy; }kjk bafxr vk{ksi oso fd;s tkrs gSaA

¶14

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= ch-,u-,l-,l- dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&m|ksx uxj] lhdj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&111@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 189¼2½] 115¼2½] 126¼2½] 127¼2½] 307] 140¼3½ ch-,u-,l- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶15

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur vkosnu vkjksi i= izLrqfr ds mijkar uohu tekur vkosnu is'k djus dh Lora=rk ds lkFk okfil fy;k x;k FkkA

¶16

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls feF;k :i ls vkfyIr fd;k x;k gS] vfHk;qDr fnukad 03-10-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vuqla/kku gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

[CRLMB-1391/2026]

[2026:RJ-JP:5321]

(2 of 2)

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶21

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶22

orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ;g vkjksi gS fd mlus vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj ifjoknh dks ,d vU; efgyk ds lkFk fuoZL= dj ohfM;ks cukdj cykRdkj dk >wBk eqdnek ntZ djokus dh /kedh nsdj rhu djksM+ :i;s dh fy[kk&i<+h vkfn dh ekax dh vkSj bl izdkj ls CySdesy fd;kA ;|fi vfHk;qDr dk vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ gS] ijarq vkgr ds dksbZ pksV izfrosnu vfHkys[k ij miyC/k ugha gS] vfHk;qDr fnukad 03-10-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vc vuqla/kku gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] 'ks"k fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA

¶23

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k vkfn dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶24

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dkukjke iq= Lo- ekaxhyky dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶25

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶26

DINESH KUMAWAT /60 (S)

Kanaram S/O Late Shri Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanaram S/O Late Shri Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijaypal @ Bhura Son of Virendra Singh @ Veero Pahalwan Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohan Lal Vs Smt Rampyari and Ors.

Mangi Lal and Others Vs Sunrise Agro Factory and Others

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt Suraji Devi and Another

Piyush Garg S/O Kunj Bihari Garg Vs State of Rajasthan

State of Rajasthan Vs M/S Bright Bharat H.G. Company